<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Photo: Red Laser</title> <atom:link href="http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2010/01/photo-red-laser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2010/01/photo-red-laser/</link> <description>and miscellaneous</description> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Richard X. Thripp</title><link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2010/01/photo-red-laser/#comment-81852</link> <dc:creator>Richard X. Thripp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:54:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=961#comment-81852</guid> <description>I used f/2.0 on this shot. 1.4 is just unusable, but the advantage of the f/1.4 lens over the cheaper f/1.8 lens is that it is much sharper at f/2.0 and is generally higher quality.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used f/2.0 on this shot. 1.4 is just unusable, but the advantage of the f/1.4 lens over the cheaper f/1.8 lens is that it is much sharper at f/2.0 and is generally higher quality.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2010/01/photo-red-laser/#comment-73337</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 12:44:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=961#comment-73337</guid> <description>Great photo.  I also use the 50mm 1.4, and I see that you had it wide open for this shot.  I've found that I need to stop down my lens to at least 2.0 to get anything sharp.Good job!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great photo.  I also use the 50mm 1.4, and I see that you had it wide open for this shot.  I&#8217;ve found that I need to stop down my lens to at least 2.0 to get anything sharp.</p><p>Good job!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 98/107 queries in 0.100 seconds using disk
Object Caching 128/129 objects using disk

Served from: richardxthripp.thripp.com @ 2012-02-11 17:59:47 -->
