<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maternity Portraits of Jacquelyn and Shaughn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 12:32:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica @ Onawa, IA Photographer</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/comment-page-1/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica @ Onawa, IA Photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=909#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>The first one has to be my favorite, She looks peaceful and he looks like he is there for her. That photo says so much. You did a really great job, I also like the one with her hand up and the shadow behind her. I know that shadows are sometimes &quot;not favored&quot; in portraits like these, but that one looks like it&#039;s meant to be there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first one has to be my favorite, She looks peaceful and he looks like he is there for her. That photo says so much. You did a really great job, I also like the one with her hand up and the shadow behind her. I know that shadows are sometimes &#8220;not favored&#8221; in portraits like these, but that one looks like it&#8217;s meant to be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard X. Thripp</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/comment-page-1/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard X. Thripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=909#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>No I did not, but he should be near his 1st birthday now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I did not, but he should be near his 1st birthday now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Big List &#60; Austin Couples Photography</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/comment-page-1/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big List &#60; Austin Couples Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 05:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=909#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>[...]  Maternity Portraits of Jacquelyn and Shaughn [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Maternity Portraits of Jacquelyn and Shaughn [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Allen</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/comment-page-1/#comment-2507</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=909#comment-2507</guid>
		<description>Love the creative posing!  Yes, getting a hold of pro lights will make a difference, but you definitely captured their &#039;spark.&#039;  Did you get a chance to follow up and take the baby pictures too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the creative posing!  Yes, getting a hold of pro lights will make a difference, but you definitely captured their &#8216;spark.&#8217;  Did you get a chance to follow up and take the baby pictures too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard X. Thripp</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard X. Thripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=909#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never done HDR (high dynamic range) but I know it involves taking multiple stationary shots at different exposures and blending them together in Photoshop or another program... It should actually be called compressed dynamic range. The purpose is to show a wider range of light than digital photo-sensors can process at once, so the sky gets darker and nearby scenery gets lighter... Some HDR photographs look awful and unnatural. Make sure whatever you do makes sense to the eye.

The principle reason to upgrade to a DSLR is so you can use higher ISO speeds like 400-1600 with much less grain... also, you can get faster lenses. If you&#039;re at a play or concert you can&#039;t take good photos without a DSLR, generally speaking. The flash is useless because the performers are so far away. You need a lens that goes down to a low F-stop (large aperture like F1.8) and a camera that can go up to a high ISO speed (high light sensitivity).

I looked at your page; nice JavaScript with the rotating photos of signs. You should try getting further away from the signs and zooming in. It doesn&#039;t reduce the image quality because the zooming process it entirely analog involving glass elements in the lens. In fact, most lenses are sharper in the mid-range... my 28-135mm lens is pretty good around 50 or 70mm, for example. At 28mm you have barrel distortion which makes everything appear wider. It&#039;s very unflattering for portraits. Going all the way to 100mm or 135mm is good for portraits, which means you have to back way up and use no flash. Then you have pincushion distortion (compression) which looks much nicer for portraits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never done HDR (high dynamic range) but I know it involves taking multiple stationary shots at different exposures and blending them together in Photoshop or another program&#8230; It should actually be called compressed dynamic range. The purpose is to show a wider range of light than digital photo-sensors can process at once, so the sky gets darker and nearby scenery gets lighter&#8230; Some HDR photographs look awful and unnatural. Make sure whatever you do makes sense to the eye.</p>
<p>The principle reason to upgrade to a DSLR is so you can use higher ISO speeds like 400-1600 with much less grain&#8230; also, you can get faster lenses. If you&#8217;re at a play or concert you can&#8217;t take good photos without a DSLR, generally speaking. The flash is useless because the performers are so far away. You need a lens that goes down to a low F-stop (large aperture like F1.8) and a camera that can go up to a high ISO speed (high light sensitivity).</p>
<p>I looked at your page; nice JavaScript with the rotating photos of signs. You should try getting further away from the signs and zooming in. It doesn&#8217;t reduce the image quality because the zooming process it entirely analog involving glass elements in the lens. In fact, most lenses are sharper in the mid-range&#8230; my 28-135mm lens is pretty good around 50 or 70mm, for example. At 28mm you have barrel distortion which makes everything appear wider. It&#8217;s very unflattering for portraits. Going all the way to 100mm or 135mm is good for portraits, which means you have to back way up and use no flash. Then you have pincushion distortion (compression) which looks much nicer for portraits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oak Brook Sign Companies</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/comment-page-1/#comment-2505</link>
		<dc:creator>Oak Brook Sign Companies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=909#comment-2505</guid>
		<description>These are very good photos, you did a great job! I just got a Nikon D40 in order to start experimenting with photography but the lighting has been my major problem so far. I never realized how much of an issue it is for photographers until I actually started dabbling in photography myself. I hate that blinding flash from the built in flash because it washes out the colors and makes annoying reflections. I&#039;ve read that a bounce flash is a good idea for indoor shots. But definitely for a portrait session such as yours, you needed some real professional lighting and I think you did a very good job with that, as well as with the editing. I like to throw my shots into Photoshop to see how I can make them better but I&#039;m still learning at this. Have you tried HDR photography? -Felix</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are very good photos, you did a great job! I just got a Nikon D40 in order to start experimenting with photography but the lighting has been my major problem so far. I never realized how much of an issue it is for photographers until I actually started dabbling in photography myself. I hate that blinding flash from the built in flash because it washes out the colors and makes annoying reflections. I&#8217;ve read that a bounce flash is a good idea for indoor shots. But definitely for a portrait session such as yours, you needed some real professional lighting and I think you did a very good job with that, as well as with the editing. I like to throw my shots into Photoshop to see how I can make them better but I&#8217;m still learning at this. Have you tried HDR photography? -Felix</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/comment-page-1/#comment-2504</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=909#comment-2504</guid>
		<description>Thanks. I&#039;ll stick with it, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I&#8217;ll stick with it, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard X. Thripp</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/comment-page-1/#comment-2503</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard X. Thripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=909#comment-2503</guid>
		<description>I used to sell electronics on eBay. I&#039;d just take photos of products by laying them in the grass in my yard. I was dependent on the lighting and weather—I took photos on cloudy afternoons for the best light. But they were much better than the normal overhead shots of items against carpet with a blinding flash.

It&#039;s hard to take good photos of large furniture items indoors because you have to get far away or use a wide-angle lens. A wide-angle lens gives unflattering barrel distortion. Getting far back and using the medium or telephoto range requires a big room. You should keep doing what you&#039;re doing now... your photos are good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to sell electronics on eBay. I&#8217;d just take photos of products by laying them in the grass in my yard. I was dependent on the lighting and weather—I took photos on cloudy afternoons for the best light. But they were much better than the normal overhead shots of items against carpet with a blinding flash.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to take good photos of large furniture items indoors because you have to get far away or use a wide-angle lens. A wide-angle lens gives unflattering barrel distortion. Getting far back and using the medium or telephoto range requires a big room. You should keep doing what you&#8217;re doing now&#8230; your photos are good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard X. Thripp</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/comment-page-1/#comment-2502</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard X. Thripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=909#comment-2502</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/10/maternity-portraits-of-jacquelyn-and-shaughn/comment-page-1/#comment-2501</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=909#comment-2501</guid>
		<description>Hey Richard,

I&#039;ve had to learn as much as I can about photography with a backdrop and artificial light. In fact, I&#039;ve not succeeded with artificial light since I don&#039;t have the equipment. So, we take all of our pictures outside on cloudy days. Here&#039;s an example of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.noonmarkantiques.com/furniture.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pennsylvania German paint decorated blanket chest&lt;/a&gt;. It&#039;s gorgeous, but I could only do this outside. What tips do you have for achieving this on a budget with indoor lighting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Richard,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had to learn as much as I can about photography with a backdrop and artificial light. In fact, I&#8217;ve not succeeded with artificial light since I don&#8217;t have the equipment. So, we take all of our pictures outside on cloudy days. Here&#8217;s an example of a <a href="http://www.noonmarkantiques.com/furniture.htm" rel="nofollow">Pennsylvania German paint decorated blanket chest</a>. It&#8217;s gorgeous, but I could only do this outside. What tips do you have for achieving this on a budget with indoor lighting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

