<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attachment to Word Count</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/07/attachment-to-word-count/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/07/attachment-to-word-count/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=attachment-to-word-count</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 06:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard X. Thripp</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/07/attachment-to-word-count/comment-page-1/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard X. Thripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=839#comment-2337</guid>
		<description>Yeah I still do it. I was happy with my latest 4000 and 1000 word articles. But I didn&#039;t mention the word count in the article or on Twitter like I normally would.

This week, I started reading every post out loud before publishing it. It&#039;s so much better than just proof-reading. Almost as good as having a second person read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I still do it. I was happy with my latest 4000 and 1000 word articles. But I didn&#8217;t mention the word count in the article or on Twitter like I normally would.</p>
<p>This week, I started reading every post out loud before publishing it. It&#8217;s so much better than just proof-reading. Almost as good as having a second person read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ursula</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/07/attachment-to-word-count/comment-page-1/#comment-2336</link>
		<dc:creator>Ursula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=839#comment-2336</guid>
		<description>*lol @ the above comments*

Well, for me, my attention span depends on several factors: my mood, my energy level, and how much time I have to work with for reading... lately, none of these factors have been favorable to reading long posts, although I sometimes write long ones myself... but sometimes I keep them short, but I know what you mean about keeping track of how many words you write and feeling proud of it... maybe it&#039;s a quirk that writers tend to have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*lol @ the above comments*</p>
<p>Well, for me, my attention span depends on several factors: my mood, my energy level, and how much time I have to work with for reading&#8230; lately, none of these factors have been favorable to reading long posts, although I sometimes write long ones myself&#8230; but sometimes I keep them short, but I know what you mean about keeping track of how many words you write and feeling proud of it&#8230; maybe it&#8217;s a quirk that writers tend to have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard X. Thripp</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/07/attachment-to-word-count/comment-page-1/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard X. Thripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 04:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=839#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>My test is if I can read it over three times after writing it without getting bored, it&#039;s not too long or repetitive. This post passed that test. Some people have shorter attention spans than me or do not enjoy thorough articles. I can&#039;t cater to everyone. I think all of the paragraphs are worthwhile here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My test is if I can read it over three times after writing it without getting bored, it&#8217;s not too long or repetitive. This post passed that test. Some people have shorter attention spans than me or do not enjoy thorough articles. I can&#8217;t cater to everyone. I think all of the paragraphs are worthwhile here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hittman</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/2009/07/attachment-to-word-count/comment-page-1/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>Hittman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 16:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.thripp.com/?p=839#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t a bad post, but it is definitely too long.  I got about halfway through before going into skim mode, then jumping to the last paragraph.  

My favorite piece of writing advice comes from Elmore Leonard: &quot;I leave out the parts people skip.&quot; You can put as much as you want into your first draft, but if the second draft isn&#039;t noticeably shorter you&#039;re probably doing it wrong.  Boil it down to it&#039;s essence, it&#039;s demi glasse, and it will be much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t a bad post, but it is definitely too long.  I got about halfway through before going into skim mode, then jumping to the last paragraph.  </p>
<p>My favorite piece of writing advice comes from Elmore Leonard: &#8220;I leave out the parts people skip.&#8221; You can put as much as you want into your first draft, but if the second draft isn&#8217;t noticeably shorter you&#8217;re probably doing it wrong.  Boil it down to it&#8217;s essence, it&#8217;s demi glasse, and it will be much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

